facts in a permanent injuction which stands dismissed will be valid?
Me and my cousin sharing a common land in between my houses, this property is given from ancestors and in which he keep on trying to encroach completely..my advocate filed a permanent injunction suit 4 years back when he attempted to encroach ,As I am not staying there, somehow he build a wall on half part of the land without our notice .
..as part of court hearing , the facts was mentioned like we both agree that this is a sharing land for both us .. hence we have equal rights on the property…he occupied the area on which he has right… Finally the suit stands dismissed as there was no physical proof of encroachment on the other half area on which I have right.
Now again he is encroached some part of the rest of half area,..
can you tell me the above suit is good enough to show as a proof of my right to show police and ask them to demolish the latest occupied area which is fall under my share of property? or do I need to go court again with any other suit ?please help